Effect of Differentiated Instruction on Students’ Achievement in Geometry

  • Anakpua Blessing C Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu-Alike Ikwo, Ebonyi State, NIGERIA
  • Nzeakor Emmanuel C University of Nigeria Nsukka, Enugu State, NIGERIA
  • Emefo Chinyere N School of Secondary Education (Science), Federal College of Education (Tech.) Bichi, Kano State, NIGERIA
Keywords: Differentiated instruction, Achievement, Geometry, Secondary school students

Abstract

This study determined the effect of differentiated instruction on students’ achievement in geometry. Two research questions and two hypotheses tested at 0.05 alpha levels guided the study.  The study employed pre-test post-test quasi-experimental research design. The population of the study consisted of 1603 Senior Secondary two (SSII) students in Onitsha North Local Government of Anambra State and a sample of 224 SSII students were randomly selected from two co-education secondary schools from the population. Geometry Achievement Test (GAT) which contained 30 items was face and content validated by three experts. Reliability of the instrument was estimated at 0.78 using split-half reliability method.  Research questions were answered using mean and standard deviation,   while the hypotheses were tested using z-test and t -test at 5% level of significance. The findings of the study showed that students that were taught geometry with differentiated instruction achieved better than those taught with conventional method. Both male and female students achieved high in geometry with the use of differentiated instruction. There is a statistically significant difference between the mean achievement scores of students taught geometry with differentiated instruction and those taught with conventional method. Again, there is no statistically significant difference between the mean achievement scores of male and female students taught geometry with differentiated instruction. It was recommended among others that Mathematics teachers and educators should adopt the use of differentiated instruction while teaching and learning mathematics. Also curriculum developers should incorporate the use of differentiated instruction in the mathematics curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abiam, P.O. & Odok, J.K. (2006). Factors in students’ achievement in different branches of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Education and Technology, (1), 161-168.

Adelabu, F.M, Makgato, M., and Ramaligela, M.S. (2019). The Importance of Dynamic Geometry Computer Software on Learners’ Performance in Geometry. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(1), pp. 52-63.

Akinsola, M. K. (2007). “Mastery learning, co-operative mastery learning strategies and students’ achievement in integrated science.” Department of Teacher Education, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Retrieved from http//www.ipn.uni- kiel.de/projket/esera/book/l132 on 20/11/2008.

Anderson, K. M., (2007). Tips for teaching: Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure, 51,(3): 49-54.

Arbain, N. and Shukor, N. A. (2014). The effects of Geo Gebra on students achievement. Procedia-Social Behavioral sciences. 172, 208-214.

Aremu, A. and John, A. (2005). Gender implications of the use of video drama in environmental education contribution in issues in language, communication and education. Counsellations books. Edited by Ayorinde Dada, Alade Abimbade and Olusegun Olaniran Kolawolwpg 342-352.

Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics.19(3), 502-530.

Bolaji, C. (2005). A study of factors influencing students’ attitude towards Mathematics in the Junior secondary schools; Mathematics teaching in Nigeria. http://www.2.ncsu.edu/ncsu/aern/bolajim.html.

Brighton, C.; Hertberg, H.; Moon, T.; Tomlinson, C.; Callahan, C. (2003). Differentiating Instruction in response to student readiness, interest and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: Areview of the literature. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 27(2/3), 119-145.

Brimijoin, K. (2001). Expertise in differentiation: A preservice and an inservice teacher make their way. A dissertation presented to the Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

Garba A. A. & Muhammad S. A. (2015). The effectiveness of differentiated instruction on students' geometric achievement in Kebbi State senior secondary schools, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6, ( I) 1905

Hollebrands, K. and Stohl Lee, H. (2011). Introduction to dynamic geometry environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science [Online].

Jones, K. (2002). Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry. In Haggarty L (Ed), Aspect of teaching secondary mathematics (121-139). London: Routledge Falmer.

Kilic, H. (2010). The effects of dynamic geometry software on learning geometry. Yeditepe University. 1-10.

Kim, J. S. (2005). The Effects of a Constructivist Teaching Approach on Student Academic Achievement, Self- concept, and Learning Strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review,6, (1), 7-19.

Koutselini, M. & Gagatsis, Ath. (2003). “Curriculum Development for the differentiated classroomin Mathematics”, World Studies in Education, 4:1, 45-67.

Kutluca, T. 2012. The effect of dynamic Mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science [Online] 31, 183-187.

Marios, P., Mousoulides, N. & Christou, C. Christou (2009). Students’ 3D geometry thinking profiles. Proceedings of CERME 6, 816

McAdamis, S. (2001). Teachers tailor their instruction to meet a variety of student needs. Journal of Staff Development, 22(2), 1-5.

Merchant, S. (2010). Methods of Teaching Mathematics. Hambard University, Karachi. HIESS.1-13.

National Mathematics Centre, Abuja. (2009). Mathematics improvement Programme. www.nmcabuja.org/mathematics_improvement_programmes.html.

Nunley, K., 2006. Differentiating the High School Classroom: Solution Strategies for 18 Common Obstacles. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Ogunsola-Bamidele, M. F. (2004). Gender sensitivity in classroom teaching and learning. Paper presentation at the train the trainers workshop for capacity building for lecturers in Colleges of Education in Nigeria.

Okeke, E.A.C. (2000). “Women in science, technology and mathematics Education in Nigeria”. Lead paper 42nd annual conference of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria (STAN).

Olunloye, O. (2010). Mass failure in mathematics: a national disaster. Tribune of 07/02/2010 retrieved from http/www.tribune.com.nig. 2011.

Owens, K. & Outhred, L. (2006).The complexity of learning geometry and measurement. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future (pp. 83-116). Sense Publishers.

Özçakir, B. (2013). The effects of mathematics instruction supported by dynamic geometry activities on seventh grade students’ achievement in area of quadrilaterals. Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University.

Reid, N. (2003). Gender and Physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (4), 509 – 536.

Salman, M.F. (2005). Teachers’ identification of the difficulty levels of topics in the primary school mathematics curriculum in Kwara State. Abacus – Journal of Mathematical Association of Nigeria. 30(1), 20 - 29 .

Tieso, C. (2002). The effects of grouping and curricular practices on intermediate students’ math achievement. Hartford, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.

Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(1), 60-89.

Tomlinson, C. A., 2000. Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. ERIC Digest.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curric.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Vale, C. (2009). Trends and factor concerning gender and mathematics in Australia. Periodical.

Vygotsky LS (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. ulum Development.

West African Examination Council.(2007). Mathematics Chief Examiner’s Reports. Lagos: WAEC.

Wikipedia (2010). The freeEncyclopedia.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main-_page.

Published
2021-05-04
How to Cite
Anakpua Blessing C, Nzeakor Emmanuel C, & Emefo Chinyere N. (2021). Effect of Differentiated Instruction on Students’ Achievement in Geometry. International Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 8(3), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijrasb.8.3.2
Section
Articles